The Star: heartwarming Nativity or violent, sexist missed opportunity?

Has anyone been wondering about seeing The Star with kids? It’s a new animated Nativity story, with lots of Hollywood voice talent, and some funny moments.
It’s also stuck in the 1980s when it comes to portrayal of women, casting and content. Sigh.
I went today with my son and friends, so here are some bullet points to help you decide whether it’s for you.
First up, here’s the trailer, so we’re all on the same page:

The Star is a Biblical Movie – sort of

The Star is a fairly standard biblical adaptation of the Matthew and Luke stories of Jesus’ birth, with some imaginative license thrown in.
If you know the story well, you’ll follow all the key plot points, and it goes slowly and obviously enough to help children follow along, too. We were the only people in the cinema, so we were able to do commentary along the way for the two six-year-olds with us.
It was a bit hard to explain why Joseph was contemplating divorcing Mary, but luckily he changed his mind soon enough and the story moved on!
If you’re¬†a fan of the¬†biblical narrative, you won’t have big theological objections to how the outline of the¬†biblical plot is presented. The¬†most common fudges are present: three wise men when the number isn’t specified in the biblical text; wise men appearing in the stable, rather than a couple of years later.¬†

The donkey plot arc of The Star has some positive moral content

The star of The Star is an abused miniature donkey called Boaz who Mary and Joseph adopt when he escapes the cruel miller who has had him tied up to grind grain for his whole life.

Boaz has dreams, y’know. He and his buddy, Dave the dove, want to run away to join the Royal Caravan, full of posh horses in golden reins, and get their share of some glory.


the star movie poster


But when they discover that Mary is in danger (more about the danger in a moment), they have to decide between glory and friendship. They make a good choice, and there’s plenty to talk about with children after the movie.

There’s also a moment near the climax that was really striking to my son, when the donkey has the opportunity to save his enemies – and does. I think that scene, and its aftermath, will be what stays with me, and hopefully my son, most from the movie. I’ll be reminding him about it tomorrow, for sure!

There’s also a plot thread about how Mary and Joseph each cope with the responsibility God has given them, which is nicely handled.

Several characters have challenges and dilemmas along the way, and make difficult, honourable choices.

Herod and his henchman are a big part of the movie, so there’s a clear set of baddies who give moral contrast.

The Star doesn’t pass the Maisy Test or even the Bechdel Test

When I was a kid, in the 80s, Smurfette was the only female character in her whole show. Can you imagine writing that show and thinking that was acceptable?

Plenty of other writers are still doing the same thing, and¬†The Star isn’t much better.

The Bechdel Test (does the movie have two female characters who speak to each other about something other than a male) is sarcastic. It’s a¬†pathetically¬†low bar, and if a movie doesn’t pass it, then¬†shame on it.

I’m sorry to tell you that¬†The Star doesn’t pass. The only conversation between¬†female characters I can recall¬†in the entire movie is when Mary and Elizabeth talk about how Mary is going to break the news of her pregnancy to Joseph. For one minute.

The Star doesn’t pass the Maisy Test either:

The Maisy Test- 4 Questions to expose sexism in kids' shows |

Pin this!

Gender Balance: Only about a quarter of the speaking characters are female, and given that most of them are fictional, and animals, there’s just no reason at all that this should be the case (I mean apart from unconscious sexism. No¬†good reason.)

For example, in the Herod-and-the-wise-men scenes, the speaking characters are King Herod, three male magi, some male scholars, a male henchman, two male dogs, two male camels and one female camel.

Now imagine writing that scene with gender balance in mind. Sure, a king’s a king,¬†but he could have some female members of his family and court present, couldn’t he? Given the status of Deborah the Prophet in the history of Israel, maybe he could have had some female advisors? The henchmen and his dogs are fictional, so there’s no reason they¬†all have to be male. The camels likewise. Why two male, one female? The Bible speaks of ‘magi’, and sure, they were most likely male, and are never enumerated (there may or may not have been three of them), but¬† since we’re happily adding a talking donkey to the mix, I’d be tempted to have a delegation of wise men and women coming from the East, myself.


The Star movie still


Gender Freedom:¬†I’ll be interested to hear other people’s opinions on whether¬†The Star should pass on this heading or not. On one hand, it’s set in a strict patriarchal society, to the extent that all women’s heads are covered. On the other, Mary and Joseph have a fairly modern relationship dynamic. He picks up dishes after their wedding party, she gives wise advice, and they generally rely on each other to get through the challenges ahead of them.

Gender Safety: I did like that Mary was a normal human being, pretty without being a princess, and with a realistic-ish figure. She’s no Disney princess, thank goodness. She’s a wise and strong woman, ready to walk to Bethlehem at nine months pregnant, with a much better attitude than I would have! But there’s a big fail, which I’ll deal with under the next heading.

Social Justice and Equality:¬†Here’s the biggest problem: the camels are sexist, ableist bastards. There are three camels, one for each wise man. Two are male and one is female (Oprah Winfrey, no less!).

One of their schticks is that they have different guesses about what’s going on, what the star signifies, and so on. Oprah is always third to guess, and she’s always the one whose guess is – as Bible readers in the audience know – correct. The ‘funny’ bit is that after her guess, the two male camels fall over themselves laughing at her and calling her ‘crazy’ for having such ridiculous ideas.

They use ableist language, are nasty about her, and basically camelsplain her to death. It’s very frustrating to watch, and so unnecessary. She calmly carries on, like so many women are socialised to do, in the face of this provocation. It’s not what I want children to see in 20-flipping-17.

The Star is WAY more violent and scary than advertised

Before I decided to take my son to The Star,¬†I read several reviews, checked out the Common Sense Media rating¬†(5+), and watched the trailer, but I¬†feel misled about the suitability of the movie. Common Sense’s summary is ‘Sweet Nativity story told from animals’ perspective,’ which makes it sound like¬†Room for A Little One come to life. It’s not.
In New Zealand¬†The Star has a G rating, the lowest possible, which means it’s suitable for any child. For context, half of the animated shows aimed at young children on Netflix have a higher than G. Heaps of animated stuff is rated PG (parental guidance recommended) because it’s too scary for little kids – and¬†The Star should definitely be in that category.¬†
There’s quite a lot of physical slapstick cartoon violence, like animals falling off cliffs, wagons colliding and smashing apart, pots breaking over people’s heads, and so on. There’s also a¬†surprising amount of actual mortal danger, with scary music to match – sharp knives flying menacingly through the air, a fire starting inside a barn, actual assaults, and more. None of that, except the existence of the dogs, is in the trailer.
And this is the thing that none of my research revealed to me: the whole story¬†revolves around Herod’s terrifying henchman chasing Mary with a sharp sword and two slavering dogs. I had two sensitive (but not extreme outliers) six-year-olds with me and it really was too scary for them. I would never have taken them if I’d had an accurate picture of the content.

Mary has blue eyes (eyeroll emoji)

I suspect Americans, and people of colour, might have more to say about race in the voice casting, and I will leave that to them – it’s a complex matter, especially as so many of the characters are not human.¬†
I’ll say that the humans all have appropriately dark hair, but Mary has flipping blue eyes! I did like that she looked like an average person, not a Disney princess. Oh, and the female camel has, wait for it, pronounced eyelashes. Eyes to the ceiling.
Overall, I think this is a lost opportunity kind of movie. None of the dodgy stuff was remotely necessary Рand none of it is acceptable in the 21st century.
There’s a lot of good, meaty, positive stuff going on in the character arcs, but for me it was drowned out by the sexism – and by the sound of my son and his friend diving into the back of the theatre chairs to cover their eyes and ears during the dozens of scary scenes.

Click through to find out more about The Maisy Test, and 13 great shows for little kids that actually pass it.

And please consider this a warm invitation to follow me on Facebook for daily links, resources and Sacraparentalish tidbits, on Pinterest for link-plantations (including these Gender Politics and Change the World boards) and on Twitter for a range of ranting.

Do you want to use one of these shiny sharing buttons?

2 comments on “The Star: heartwarming Nativity or violent, sexist missed opportunity?”

  1. Stephanie Reply

    Interesting, thanks for the heads up. I wondered what the fuss about the camel’s gender was, like how anatomically accurate the cartoon was that you even knew what sex they were, until I realised they were actual speaking characters! I can see the point of the Maisy test, but some films should be made historically accurate e.g. war movies, if they are geniunely in a narrow setting where there were no females/limited diversity. It erks me when film makers change the morals etc in what are meant to be historically accurate portrayals. I know for me portrayals of biblical stories always have an extra magnifying glass on them, I guess it’s a bit like any historical story that you already know, not quite the same as being drawn into a story with an unknown plot and ending. The topic of scary/AO bits of the Bible (or other historical or current events) and what you tell your kids is of interest to me. I don’t want to sanitise it, that’s something I love about the scriptural narrative, these people, most of the (yup male) heros were seriously flawed. But I have one kid who thinks full length ‘movie’ is the definition of scary, and another who was so scared by a Veggietales DVD with some ancient nasty king in it I didn’t even have them watch them for while!

  2. Frank Reply

    Unfortunately, in NZ, they don’t actually watch most G rated films, they just go along with the ratings from USA, Australia and the UK.
    I really think that any film that has a different rating in one of those countries should be watched by someone here. This film was PG in the US and I think that’s a much more suitable classification.
    You can complain to the classification office if you think a rating is inappropriate. Then you can pay $20 for it to be actually watched by someone and properly assessed (although the rating may change), or if enough people complain (as they did with The Secret Life of Pets, which got reclassified as a PG after being watched by a censor) they’ll do it without any payment.
    Details on how to complain are here:

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badge